Nuclear: Eskom to press ahead with RFP in 2010


Eskom head of age bracket Matshela Koko on Tuesday looked determined, if not desperate, for you to issue a acquire proposals (RFP) for new fischer electricity generation ability.

Koko took this position in spite of an indication by the United states doe that South Africa might only need new fischer capacity from 2037 and never in 2022 as previously stated.

With a lead-time having a minimum of ten years, that would push back nuclear procurement by simply at least a decade.

Koko ended up being part of a table including energy reverend Tina Joemat-Pettersson and top authorities of her team, who presented the draft Integrated Energy Plan and nfl draft base case for any Integrated Resource Plan in Cape Village.

These plans will pre-plan the country’s energy requires and preferred offer options until 2050. The public has been invited to comment on the particular assumptions used, the underside case scenarios and other examples that should be considered, and then for any other relevant challenges.

For this purpose consumer consultation forums will likely be held in Gauteng, the North western and Eastern Cpe and KwaZulu-Natal in the subsequent week of 12 and in other provinces in January. Your documents would even more be discussed for Nedlac in February and really should be finalised and also approved by pantry around April the coming year.

Intensive Energy User Pair of Southern Africa spokesman Shaun Nel said rendering the RFP before the options have been finalised might be premature, since the designs should inform your procurement process. He was quoted saying in terms of certain predicaments, nuclear might be forced out even further.

Koko having said that said during the briefing of which under certain scenarios – including the capping of new green energy generation – the first fischer reactor would have to be in development by 2025, with the intro of further reactors at regular intervals after.

This would necessitate purchasing starting?as soon as possible.

His posture was confirmed in a official Eskom press release at a later time Tuesday: “Eskom’s current strategies are closely aligned to a base instance scenario that takes Southwest Africa’s carbon budget into consideration and annual restrictions on bringing renewables in to the grid. This scenario demands the first nuclear unit by 2026. To this end, Eskom possesses indicated that it will proceed with the request for offer for nuclear by the end of December 2016 as most indications show 2026 is feasible to deliver the first machine.”

The statement quoted Koko declaring: “Should these assumptions not really hold and another scenario comes into play in Drive 2017, we will change keeping that in mind.”

While other panel participants seemed to be heading inside of a completely different direction, they did not openly contradict or even criticise Koko’s position.

In the base case displayed, a total of 20 385MW of brand new nuclear generation capability would be introduced to this grid between 2037 and 2050. That is over double the 9 600MW ship to in the current IRP that provides for energy planning around 2030.

The 20 385MW would likely comprise of 1 359MW launched in 2037, as much in 2039, 4 077 MW added in 2041 and also thereafter additional reactors included every year from 2044 to help 2050. This was in accordance with average nuclear worth of $5 400/kWh, which the department takes into account to be conservative.

Installed fossil fuel capacity would reduce to fifteen 000MW by 2050 using provision for Thirty five 000MW of gas age bracket and 55 000MW of renewables (gas and pv photovoltaic). Provision can be further made for 3 500MW, from the Grand Inga hydroelectrical design in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, being introduced to the power grip between 2030 as well as 2033.

Nuclear and coal might however still generate the biggest volume of electrical energy due to its nature while base load. Renewables are simply just available for about 30% of times.


The Department of Energy is currently tests various scenarios of which, together with public suggestions regarding assumptions applied, might impact on the scale and pace of rolling out the innovative capacity. These include big changes in fuel expenses, lower-than-expected electricity demand, opportunities from other parts of areas (including gas together with hydro power), the development of ancient gas, the effect if no cap appeared to be placed on renewable energy, the issue of technological enhancements including electricity storage space and implications for your electricity network.

The team is inviting stakeholders to comment on its forecasts for electricity require specifically. It has structured its demand anticipates on studies by way of the CSIR, including a high- and low-demand case.


Nel said the desire expectations look outlandish, especially since the affect of the base condition proposals on an electrical source tariffs is not clear. He said historically a department’s demand estimations were very completely wrong.

He said the assumptions regarding levelised cost of all the technologies should be interrogated even more, but welcomed very good in the base situation of the role in which renewables combined with gas could play in the country’s electricity supply.

The Life After Coal Campaign?consists of?groundWork,?the Middle of the town for Environmental Protection under the law?and?Earthlife Africa, Johannesburg

said within a statement although a boost in renewable energy capacity is certainly planned, “these plans hardly touch on the potential contribution from renewables. Because fossil fuel and nuclear power are planned to contribute the most to the volume of (energy incorporate) energy supplied by The year 2050, the significant potential for thoroughly clean, healthy, cost-effective renewable energy could be constrained”.


It questioned the provision pertaining to nuclear and the distinctive scenarios mentioned together with the significant portion of generation capacity that would however rely on coal.

“The Promotion objects to the improvement of any new fossil fuel or nuclear age group into South Africa’s upcoming energy mix, with the significant health, natural environment, climate change and cost implications of coal along with nuclear.”

The Campaign is definitely further concerned how the consultation period that includes the festive year or so, would be inadequate together with said it would be unacceptable for the Department never to make the full IRP obtainable for consultation and opinion.

Tags : IndustryNews

The author admin

Leave a Response